![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis Marlatte" wrote in message t... "Skidder" wrote in message ... Not until we find a reg that stipulates the second pilot is a pax. -- Skidder I think that's asking a bit much. Why would there be such a reg? The vast majority of laws, guidelines and beliefs in our society define requirements to be an "X." Why would we need to continue, then, to clarify the requirements for not being an "X?" We have the sole manipulator of the controls (PIC) and we have a person responsible for the flight (loggable PIC). That's usually the same person but, by negative inference, everyone else is a passenger - unless one of them is a CFI in which case they get blamed for everything even if they are in the back seat. (that's a bad joke that has seen the light of day) ------------------------------- Don't forget about safety pilot if flying under the hood. Danny Deger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Solo | W P Dixon | Piloting | 8 | August 16th 06 05:07 AM |
How do you keep current? | Rachel | Piloting | 18 | January 30th 06 01:24 AM |
L33 Solo | Jeff Runciman | Soaring | 1 | November 14th 05 08:57 AM |
1.4 solo.. | Beav | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 5th 04 12:27 AM |
Solo in a 2-32 | M B | Soaring | 3 | September 30th 03 03:11 AM |