![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darryl, I admit I oversimplified things. One of the reasons was that I
deal with analog ultrasonic signals produced by nature, not digital pulse trains from transponders, so it made a first cut analysis easier for me. Hopefully Zaon will be willing to tell Eric what they're really doing inside the box. Since I own a MRX and am planning on installing a transponder, I'd be more than happy if my analysis at the start of this thread is wrong! Meanwhile, it sounds like you understand transponders, RF and digital processing. Can you refer me to something on the web that would explain the basics of how partially overlapped pulse trains are differentiated? Using a stand-alone detector on analog signals of similar frequency and fairly similar shape, I know I can't detect a second signal 20-30 dB below an overlapping signal - so the possibility you hint of for digital signals is outside of my knowledge. Thanks! -John On Mar 10, 1:34 pm, " wrote: Also it is worth remembering the Zaon PCAs devices are not just "blanking" the receiver during the local transponder reply. The Zaons are reading and doing an altitude decode of the local transponder signal and using that if possible for the altitude reference rather than the built in altimeter. How good their RF front end and post RF digital processing is will determine how well they can differentiate partially overlapping pulse trains from the local and other transponders. And you better believe they have to do this since the most nieve approach of "blanking" during the entire ~20us transponder pulse train (ignoring the ident pulse) would give a dead zone of ~6km. I'd love to see a schematic.. :-) Like other posters I suspect this not much of an issue in practice because of multipe illuminations from SSR, TCAS etc. However one thing with some of the funkier glider tranponder antenna installs is that the PCAS may be seeing much more RF power from the local transponder than the designer expected, especially for situations like with RF transparent fiberglass fueslages and maybe a less than great ground plane betwen the PCAS and antenna, tranponder antennas mounted in the cockpit etc. In which case maybe the dead zone is larger because of the Zaon's reduced ability to detect overlapping pulse trains. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monroy ADT-200 TPAS | Ramy Yanetz | Soaring | 6 | May 10th 05 09:58 AM |
TPAS experiences - good, bad, and ugly | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 1 | January 19th 05 09:49 PM |
Blind 430 | john smith | Owning | 16 | January 4th 05 07:57 PM |
FS : TPAS Sure Check model RX-110 | Brian | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 16th 04 03:21 PM |
Surecheck TPAS (was Proxalert R?) | Tim Mara | Soaring | 0 | February 10th 04 07:19 PM |