![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes: I know the answer. My point is that a pilot should not get anywhere near an IFR flight plan if he/she doesn't know the answer to that question. I am not being melodramatic. It can get you killed. You NEED to know that stuff. So what is the answer? I believe your question was: "This still leaves some unanswered questions, though. If you are given a heading without a fix, and the heading does not intercept your flight plan or any approach or any expected routing, where do you go? In VMC you are clearly expected to go VFR and land. In IMC, what do you do?" If you don't know the regulation and the controller makes a mistake (they do) and does not give you the fix/reason you are being vectored, then it is ambiguous. You always need to know why you are being vectored and what you are being vectored to. So if you get vectors and are not told anything else other than you are being vectored you need to ask them why/where to, etc. They are required to give that information to you. The fact that the person did not even look it up and instead came to a newsgroup for an answer is also a problem. Where would he look it up? Your assumption tht those who don't post the answer don't know the answer is ridiculous. It's actually very logical. People who have the answer are usually more than willing to give it. Those who don't are usually eager to find a way to distract attention from their failure to provide an answer. And, of course, some people just make things up. Your logic is flawed. Not all people are like you and want to show off how much they (think they) know. Spoon feeding pilots who are dangerous and ignorant is a sure way to disaster. So when I don't look something up, it's bad; and when I do look something up, it's bad. Do you see a problem here? I didn't say that. Not looking it up or knowing where to look it up is a problem. It is one thing if it is a vfr pilot asking - or someone curious about it. But if the pilot is instrument rated and files IFR for flights he/she should know it. That person probably then has other gaps in their training and is a danger to himself and others. In your little world of games, icing, lost comms, etc don't happen, and when they do no one dies. In the real world pilots like these can kill themselves and others. I don't want them flying around when I am up there flying around. Since you don't know what to do in this situation, I suppose yours would be the first NTSB report. explitive deleted you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Real-world IFR currency | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | March 23rd 05 04:19 PM |
Real World Problem in FS9 | The Real Cali Kid | Simulators | 12 | December 6th 03 11:15 AM |
Real World Weather (Isabelle) | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | September 21st 03 09:53 PM |
Real-time real world air traffic in flight sims | Marty Ross | Simulators | 6 | September 1st 03 04:13 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |