![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Garret wrote:
In article , Tim wrote: So you are saying that one has to change operating rules based on the route of the flight. No, I am not saying that. Why do you keep putting words in my mouth? I don't have to - they are right he "Because it's a different route. The circumstances are different. What one does when flying to FUL may or may not apply when flying to VNY." If you did not mean that, then please explain to my why you have two different examples and two different scenarios? I would imagine that the regulations provide a good description of what has to happen for all circumstances. All I tried to point out was the fallacy of your suggestions in your examples. It is your clearance limit because that is where you filed to and where you want to land. No, it was my clearance limit because that is where I was cleared to. Yes, I understand that. And they gave you that clearance limit because that is what you requested from them - when you filed. That is the end of your flight and they gave you a clearance to there. It is not a clearance to hold there is it? Because what you are arguing is that you really only have a clearance to circle the airport every time you get a clearance that starts with "cleared to xxx airport" and ends in "...direct." You are expecting that every time you fly to an airport you are going to fly to the airport, but somewhere along the line a controller is going to lead you to an IAF, the final approach course, or some other way get you to land. If your clearance limit is an airport, what makes you think you can't execute an IAP and land? Why would you think that the clearance limit for your airport is at some altitude other than 0 AGL? I am beginning to suspect that MX is right and you don't actually have a clue. That is fine with me. Again, "direct" does not mean direct to the airport. That's news to me. Where in the regs does it say that? When you don't lose comms and you file and fly to an airport and do not get vectors, where do you go to? You go to an IAF, right? Not usually. Usually I get vectors to the FAF. I fly in pretty congested airspace where full approaches are quite rare. I misunderstood your initial question and I apologize for any demeaning statements. It appeared to me that you were not aware of what the FARs stated. Again, my apologies. Well, it's possible I'm missing something. We seem to have a difference of opinion about what a direct clearance means. I'm still waiting for a citation to support your position. rg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Real-world IFR currency | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | March 23rd 05 04:19 PM |
Real World Problem in FS9 | The Real Cali Kid | Simulators | 12 | December 6th 03 11:15 AM |
Real World Weather (Isabelle) | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | September 21st 03 09:53 PM |
Real-time real world air traffic in flight sims | Marty Ross | Simulators | 6 | September 1st 03 04:13 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |