![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J.Kahn wrote:
The normal subsonic LD would be very low, about 6 or 7 to 1 at best. The supersonic shockwave riding phenomenon they are talking about is something else though and could I guess be true, although it's surprising no other supersonic a/c has tried to exploit it. The note in Wikipedia regarding the L/D for the XB-70 says: "There is a popular belief and some sources claim that this helps the XB-70 have the highest lift-to-drag ratio on a powered, manned aircraft.[2]", so they clearly state that someone else believes it, but they make no claim to the truth of it. Now, note [2] points to: http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~portwi...ft/xb_70a.html which says: "Overall, the XB-70 has the best lift-to-drag ratio of any manned airplane ever built, being bettered only on the unmanned S-21 drone..." As Mr. Kahn points out, the L/D of this aircraft subsonically will be well below 10, which is nothing to speak of. Supersonically, we can reference: http://www.aerospaceweb.org/design/w...shtml#complift which indicates that at Mach 3, we can expect L/D ratios of 5-6, max. for aircraft using compression lift. Now, that's pretty good for supersonic flight, and if the claims above had said "the best L/D ratio of any manned SUPERSONIC aircraft", it would probably be true. But it's clearly not the highest L/D of any manned aircraft - my COZY MKIV has a glide ratio of about 14:1, which I proved just last December by losing my propeller and gliding down 17 NM to L64 from 9500 ft. Gliders, of course, are much higher - up to 50:1, or even better. -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2007 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|