![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Dan Luke" wrote: Although an interesting anecdote, absolutely useless I think for considering what radio to put in the plane in question. The point was not about getting anywhere near the money back as what was spent on it (sic). The point is that an older airplane without a 430 is more difficult to sell than one so equipped; hardly a useless consideration when considering a NAV/COM upgrade. Um, I don't see how it is a good thing to throw money away just so that the plane sells... If, at some time the owner wants to sell, he/she can always put it in the panel or reduce the price. Spending 12k on a 430 and then getting maybe 1k more on the sale over what was in the panel originally is not really worth it - you are doing yourself no favors. You're still not getting it. To me, it doesn't make sense to agonize over buying (or selling) a plane based on whether it has a 430 in it or not. In my case, even if I had the 430, there would be folks who wouldn't look at the plane because it doesn't have leather, or it doesn't have a newer audio panel, or it doesn't have an autopilot, or it doesn't have one thing or another that they're looking for. If I was looking at a plane, avionics would be one of the last things I'd look at, and when I did look at avionics, I'd negotiate the price down if I felt that avionics work was needed. At that point, it would be up to the seller to determine whether there was a market for his plane at his asking price. The reality is that, despite what some people may think, a 430 is not required equipment in an airplane these days, even if you fly IFR. There may be folks whose use of the plane will benefit from an IFR GPS, but my guess is that it is a true requirement for very few. JKG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
737 Replacement | john smith | Piloting | 26 | October 22nd 06 05:21 AM |
TKM 170 as a replacement radio | Ian Taylor | Owning | 12 | September 10th 05 11:29 PM |
F-15J Replacement | Prowlus | Military Aviation | 8 | April 28th 04 02:16 PM |
EP-3 replacement? | user | Naval Aviation | 23 | December 6th 03 09:46 PM |
FA OLD AIRCRAFT RADIO TRANSMITTER STANDARD RADIO | Ron | Restoration | 0 | October 26th 03 12:02 AM |