![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember the D radar having about 20-25% better range than the E.
the E wasn't all that bad; ran about 50-60 miles on other F4s over water. Our 390TFS Ds could pickup tankers at 75 miles over Thailand. (Cherry anchor) I had a USN F4J pilot in my back seat one night gunship escort mission ( can't for the life of me remember why)and he marveled at the radar pickup. I asked him why he thought it was soo good when he was flying the J model. He told me after about 4 'standard' carrier landings the radar wasn't so hot anymore. One problem we had with th E was overheating on the ground at DaNang in the summer trying to run bit checks taxiing out. So we left it in standby and did them airborne. AFIK we never took a gun pod North. The O6s had an E with a CL drop and 2 SUU23s on the wings but I don't think anyone below full bird got to fly it. We did hang SUU23s on our Ds for in-country work. Going North it was CL, mers, ters sometimes, AIM9s and AIM7s and a jammer pod, usually in the rt fwd Sparrow well. Ed's on the money on the 36/37 RHAW gear - I monitored the audio and kept an eye on the AZ strobe when the audio sounded interesting. As for over-all radar performance TAC blew it when they went to the storage tube instead of a straight CRT. They threw away at least 3 db performance. AMAF the average D was about equal to our F102As at RG AFB. (We had the best radar people I ever met in the USAF). We could pick up 135s and B52s well over 100 miles over land. FWIW a CRT will let a trained eye pick up a target as low as minus 3 db compared to the average noise level - because it's there all the time and the noise jumps around. In the storage tube the average noise level becomes the cut-off level and you have a nice clean scope and threw away maybe 10% of your range capability. Also - dropping IRSTS was really dumb. I used the Deuce's IR system and while it had bugs (LN2 leaks, usually) when it was working it was superb. Very flexible, very sneaky, very good at low level - TAC F100D low level. BTW every fighter I flew except the F86F had AI radar in it so I was no cherry when I got in the F4 - by then I had about 3000 hours pushing a TV around the sky. Walt BJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: Vietnam The Helicopter War Large HC Book 189p | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 6th 04 05:19 PM |
Dogfights in Vietnam | Mike | Military Aviation | 11 | July 30th 03 09:47 PM |
Australia tries to rewrite history of Vietnam War | Evan Brennan | Military Aviation | 34 | July 18th 03 11:45 PM |
Trying to make sense of Vietnam air war | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 6th 03 11:13 PM |
Vietnam search to continue to find remains of Waterford pilot | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 03 10:30 PM |