![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 2:15 pm, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: wrote in message oups.com... You just don't give up, !!!! Would you give up if you were in my position? In the 25 years I have been flying in EVERY instance I was cleared to land by a controller in a tight spacing situation the call from the tower to the preceding plane was " N12345 exit runway as soon as possible, landing aircraft on a 1/2 mile final behind you" Jay stated there was no communication from that tower to the offending aircraft stopped on the runway. So, my question to you ,almighty controller, Isn't the tower operator responsible for the traffic on 'HIS" runway? A simple one word answer will do. YES or NO ? I can't wait to see how you will spin this one. GGGGG I'll be happy to answer your question, right after you answer mine. That's only fair, I asked first. To make it easy for you, here it is again: FAR 91.3(a) states; "The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft." If a preceding properly-spaced aircraft uses his final authority as to the operation of his aircraft and stops on the runway ahead of you, forcing the tower controller to issue a go around, who would you hold directly responsible? A simple one word answer will do. PILOT or CONTROLLER? Hell, Thats an easy answer. Even a caveman or a pilot can answer that. G Read this real slow thickhead... A competent tower controller that just stuck a slower and higher landing trafffic in front of another aircraft that he/she ALREADY cleared to land should have stated to the preceding plane " exit the runway without delay, landing traffic on a 1/2 mile final" while the preceding plane was still on the rollout. He/she should not have waited for the guy/girl to make a complete stop on the runway. If you just go back and reread this whole thread it should become crystal clear to a sane and competent controller that Jay was given a go around because of the tower controller was asleep at the switch. There are those of us who make a living in the private sector and have to prove ourselves every day to stay employed. Then there is the government workers who BS their way though life and the system to make it to retirement, milking the system the whole time.... Jay and I and alot of others work for the private sector and are surviving in the black. Your employer is the US government who is 9+ trillion in the red. It is either your move or checkmate on our part... In closing I still admit that Steven. P. Mc Nicoll knows his regs probably better then most other aviation people ,, But he forgot his common sense at the office.. Blueskies and tailwinds...... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |