![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Hell, Thats an easy answer. Even a caveman or a pilot can answer that. G Well, as you didn't answer it, I'll have to assume you are neither. Read this real slow thickhead... No need. I can read it quickly, no matter how slowly you wrote it. A competent tower controller that just stuck a slower and higher landing trafffic in front of another aircraft that he/she ALREADY cleared to land should have stated to the preceding plane " exit the runway without delay, landing traffic on a 1/2 mile final" while the preceding plane was still on the rollout. There was no need for that. He/she should not have waited for the guy/girl to make a complete stop on the runway. The pilot should not have made a complete stop on the runway regardless. If you just go back and reread this whole thread it should become crystal clear to a sane and competent controller that Jay was given a go around because of the tower controller was asleep at the switch. How could the controller give Jay a go around while he was asleep at the switch? To those of us that have read this whole thread and also have some knowledge of ATC procedures it is crystal clear that Jay had plenty of room behind the preceding 172, and that an alert controller issued a go around to Jay when he observed the 172 had stopped on the runway. Good for him. There are those of us who make a living in the private sector and have to prove ourselves every day to stay employed. Just like the controllers at JEF. Then there is the government workers who BS their way though life and the system to make it to retirement, milking the system the whole time.... Jay and I and alot of others work for the private sector and are surviving in the black. Your employer is the US government who is 9+ trillion in the red. It is either your move or checkmate on our part... You can only hope to perform your job as well as I perform mine. In closing I still admit that Steven. P. Mc Nicoll knows his regs probably better then most other aviation people ,, But he forgot his common sense at the office.. Those with common sense don't hold controllers responsible for a pilot's mistake. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |