![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Having one yahoo not following the same procedure as everyone else no matter where the procedure comes from is not safe. Having some local yahoo publish a "mandatory" noise abatement procedure is not safe. If the procedure itself is not safe, it needs to be changed. This isn't rocket science. Agreed. As the procedure conflicts with the ODP it is clearly unsafe and needs to be changed. Yeah, so what? That just means that a specific procedure needs to be modified and says absolutely nothing about the desirablity of following noise abatement procedures in general. There have been established ATC procedures that were changed because they were deemed to be dangerous. How would this be any different? Look at the procedures for CCB: http://www.cableairport.com/images/vfr24.gif http://www.cableairport.com/images/vfr6.gif See anything unsafe there? Yes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Round Engines | john smith | Piloting | 20 | February 15th 07 03:31 AM |
induced airflow | buttman | Piloting | 3 | February 19th 06 04:36 AM |
Round Engines | Voxpopuli | Naval Aviation | 16 | May 31st 05 06:48 PM |
Source of Induced Drag | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 2 | January 10th 04 12:18 AM |
Predicting ground effects on induced power | Marc Shorten | Soaring | 0 | October 28th 03 11:18 AM |