![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sammy writes:
Not in the seat next to them they wouldn't. He doesn't have to be in the seat next to them. The fact that it hasn't happened in all these years of aviation makes it more than just a little unlikely. It's definitely so unlikely it's silly. The issue is not whether or not the scenario is silly, but what would actually happen. In risk management, this type of thought experiment is common and useful. Not certified for IIIc means a good chance of hitting the ground so hard you create a crater or stalling the plane at high speed a few feet above the ground. Hardly. It's still a much better bet than having a non-pilot try to land by hand. ...and runways world wide are STILL being extended to cope with the A380. Those extensions may be premature. There are still notorious approaches around the place. You don't direct an aircraft with an emergency to a notorious approach. The unrealistic perfect situation you mention is better called a fantasy. Automation such as I have discussed is more the rule than the exception in airliners. ATC can't reopen runways for you or make the weather go away. It doesn't have to. How does this not apply in an emergency? In this emergency, there's only one pilot. You have to do certain things at certain times and if you can't within the time limit something goes wrong. Sometimes. Not all omissions will cause serious problems, though. If all these things are working perfectly AND if you can instruct the FMC and other automated systems correctly and in a timely manner. They routinely work perfectly; they are very reliable (otherwise they would be of no use). You can carry out the necessary operations easily with a bit of help. Takeoff and landing are rarely automated at the moment. Take-off is rarely automated; landing is from time to time (even in clear weather). But these are only small parts of a flight. And the part of the flight that begins when the pilots are incapacitated in this scenario can be fully automated all the way to touchdown and rollout. No its not done every day by an untrained person.instructed over a radio. That's why such a scenario would be considered an emergency. The fantasy is that everything goes right just because on this particular day you have incapacitated pilots and that some janitor can just be told to press a sequence of buttons to get the plane on the ground. Everything would go right, just as it does just about every day. It's unrealistic to assume that the aircraft would coincidentally fail at the same time as the pilots are incapacitated. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off-topic, but in need of help | dennis | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 4th 07 10:40 PM |
Almost on topic... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 22 | January 30th 06 06:55 PM |
off topic, just a little--maybe? | L.D. | Home Built | 5 | August 27th 05 04:56 PM |
off topic | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 0 | January 2nd 04 01:29 PM |