A tower-induced go-round

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
I pointed out the conflict between the ODP and the noise abatement procedure
before you identified it as being for VFR operations only. Initially you
did not differentiate between IFR and VFR.

Hey, smacktard. You might want to use the grey squishy stuff between
your ears once in a while.

Jim's message, posted Mar 27:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9fc06a96c2e42f

Not only are the procedure images named VFR, the cards themselves SAY
they're VFR procedures.

VFR operations can be conducted with as little as one mile visibility.

And a Cessna at best rate has 40 seconds closing time at that
visibility, what's your point? (Best angle's got a whole 53!)

Why did you not identify them as VFR procedures initially?

Jim has not yet come quite to the realization of how far your fantasy
land extends.

Are you really that dense?

I'm not at all dense.

Oh, then how come you haven't floated away yet?

:P

I'm sorry, this really needed to be posted. I'm not usually this
venomous. Take your head out of your ass, man!

TheSmokingGnu