|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
August 12th 03, 05:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Brash wrote: "Defender in Tas" wrote in message om... ill. The Hawk 127 is primarily a trainer, with a secondary ground attack role. Its a "Lead In Fighter" ****tard. The PC9 is a "trainer". IIRC the RAF refers to them as a 'fast jet trainer'. Riddle me this dickhead, why does the configuration of the Hawk 127 cockpit closely match that of the F/A-18, and why is the Hawk 127 capable of employing AIM9s? Can't comment on the exact detail of that but basically simple. BAe can sell them innocently enough as 'trainers', whereas the customer knows their true potential. Nice selling feature. PB 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IFR Flight Plan question | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 13th 04 12:55 AM |
| NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
| Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
| IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |
| USA Defence Budget Realities | Stop SPAM! | Military Aviation | 17 | July 9th 03 02:11 AM |
Threaded Mode