Why The Hell... (random rant)

writes:

A sensor to find true north in an airplane in flight doesn't exist.

GPS finds true north. And, just incidentally, you can find true north by
looking at the sky. ANS will do that, and people can do it, too.

The isogonic lines on a chart take care of all the problems of where
the actual north/south magnetic poles are.

Documenting them doesn't really eliminate them.

Wrong again, bucko, there is nothing better for finding north in an
airplane in flight.

GPS is better, and more accurate, to name just one.

The only ways to find true north are celestial navigation and a true
gyro compass.

You can find true north by looking at the sky, or with GPS, or with ANS
(automated looking at the sky), or with an INS. The latter usually has to be
on the ground, although some systems support align-in-motion with a longer
setup time.

You can't use celestial navigation unless you have a clear sky, an
almanac, a precise clock, and the necessary instruments to measure
celestial angles and the training to be able to use it all.

You need a precise clock to do just about any navigation. The need for the
rest is debatable, depending on how resourceful you are.

GPS could be used to indirectly find either type of north, but it
doesn't work without power, which is an important concideration
when flying a real airplane without a pause button.

Unless the airplane is a glider, you have power.

Inertial navigation requires an initial set up against something
else, constant updating measured in minutes, and again, power.

One third correct: it requires power, but engines provide power. It doesn't
have to be set up against anything else to find true north. It doesn't need
to be constantly updated; the whole idea is to be fairly autonomous.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.