A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why The Hell... (random rant)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old April 5th 07, 01:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Why The Hell... (random rant)

Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Natalie writes:

No you are confused. Magnetic SOUTH is the exact opposite of magentic
north you fool. The fact that the MAGNETIC SOUTH POLE is not exactly
opposite the MAGNETIC NORTH POLE is a different issue.


I assumed that others would understand this, but I often get into trouble when
I assume others will understand things.


You expect others to understand things when you blither incorrect
concepts.

The fact that
the poles aren't aligned with the arbitrary "true" datum just means that
the variation equations aren't as simple as they might be.


They are more than just misaligned: they are not at opposite points in terms
of longitude and latitude, either. A line drawn between them does not
intersect the center of the Earth.


Correct, that was my point. It doesn't change anything. Magnetic
south and magnetic north are still opposite directions at any given
point on the earth.

Really, like what?


GPS and inertial reference platforms, VORs, NDBs, you name it.


GPS and INS use elaborate internal computation to determine it, yes.
Haven't ever seen an INS in anything smaller than a transport category.

NDB's chortle..you haven't a clue.
VORs not on your life, unless you're sitting on station.
You should learn something about navigation and geodessy before
you make these bogus statements.


Compasses are still damned reliable compared to
anything else. Cheap too. The only thing that presumes to do better
perhaps is GPS. And it's easier to program that to deal with the
magnetic measurements than to try to force everybody else the other
way.


So how often do you fly using just your magnetic compass alone?

Give me a chart and a compass and I'll do just fine VFR. Managed
to fly the Navion around just fine that way when I had all the
avionics and the gyros pulled out while I was redoing the panl.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RANT! wise purchaser Owning 2 March 27th 07 10:04 PM
Random thoughts 2 Bill Daniels Soaring 6 September 1st 06 05:37 AM
A Jeppesen rant Peter R. Piloting 4 January 17th 05 03:54 AM
Why didn't GWB [insert rant] Jack Military Aviation 1 July 15th 04 11:30 PM
Random Hold Generator... Tina Marie Instrument Flight Rules 0 November 5th 03 04:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.