A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Building a composite spar?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old April 5th 07, 05:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
dirigible designer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default Building a composite spar?

On Apr 4, 5:45 pm, "SkyDaddy" wrote:
No offense, but I'm not sure a 100-foot airship will qualify as
"cheap" when you consider what it will take to fill it with helium and
store it securely. There's also the matter of getting dirigible
licenses from the FAA for the ship and its "working guy" pilot.

But practicality aside (this IS experimental aviation, after all), why
not use extruded aluminum bolted up into triangular trusses? It
worked for Count Zeppelin!


I've got this idea that a bunch of plastics and fiberglass is cheaper
than buying aluminum extrusions and rivets. Could be wrong, especially
if labor time is figured, [which it isn/t ;-]
Actually, there's not much way the ship could be 100' long and
"economical." The spar might be approaching 100' linear length but it
is curved into a C-shape and forms the circumference of the airship.
If you looked down on the design, it is a D-shape, with the flat edge
being the stern with the control surfaces. The length of the ship
would be only about 32'. It's a saucer with airfoil. That size doesn't
hold a lot of lift gas, and it needs to lift two persons and an
electric motor with PV cells, so the framework must be of minimal
weight and complexity.
The main challenge is the big strong lightweight frame spar around
the middle. It perhaps should be no bigger than ~ 3' wide. It has a
triangular cross section and is maybe stiffened with EPS foam or with
a bundle of polyethylene tubes, [which might get too expensive], and
covered in thin fiberglass skin.
Any alternatives which might work? How strong is a simple double-
walled f'glass tube with sheet EPS between walls?
thanks from Allen
P.s. Oh, yes, storage costs. The framework must be foldable after
deflation. I am maintaining, as second priority, the folding feature
as the design evolves.
As far as aircraft and pilot license fees, I think that this ship
design could be downsized to end up as an ultralight. It's an easier
process to design and consider a larger study prototype and get all
the aerodynamics and mechanics figured out before tackling the rigors
of extreme weight- trimming. [to my thinking, anyway]

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie question about the spar and building Randy Home Built 6 January 21st 07 08:19 PM
Spar workshop CD and DVD available mat Redsell Soaring 0 May 6th 04 03:52 PM
spar varnish Lou Parker Home Built 5 May 3rd 04 04:19 PM
F.A. Hollmann's Composite Building Books & More BASSMANCP Home Built 0 February 19th 04 01:07 PM
Spar gluing Lou Parker Home Built 26 November 21st 03 08:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.