![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 5:45 pm, "SkyDaddy" wrote:
No offense, but I'm not sure a 100-foot airship will qualify as "cheap" when you consider what it will take to fill it with helium and store it securely. There's also the matter of getting dirigible licenses from the FAA for the ship and its "working guy" pilot. But practicality aside (this IS experimental aviation, after all), why not use extruded aluminum bolted up into triangular trusses? It worked for Count Zeppelin! I've got this idea that a bunch of plastics and fiberglass is cheaper than buying aluminum extrusions and rivets. Could be wrong, especially if labor time is figured, [which it isn/t ;-] Actually, there's not much way the ship could be 100' long and "economical." The spar might be approaching 100' linear length but it is curved into a C-shape and forms the circumference of the airship. If you looked down on the design, it is a D-shape, with the flat edge being the stern with the control surfaces. The length of the ship would be only about 32'. It's a saucer with airfoil. That size doesn't hold a lot of lift gas, and it needs to lift two persons and an electric motor with PV cells, so the framework must be of minimal weight and complexity. The main challenge is the big strong lightweight frame spar around the middle. It perhaps should be no bigger than ~ 3' wide. It has a triangular cross section and is maybe stiffened with EPS foam or with a bundle of polyethylene tubes, [which might get too expensive], and covered in thin fiberglass skin. Any alternatives which might work? How strong is a simple double- walled f'glass tube with sheet EPS between walls? thanks from Allen P.s. Oh, yes, storage costs. The framework must be foldable after deflation. I am maintaining, as second priority, the folding feature as the design evolves. As far as aircraft and pilot license fees, I think that this ship design could be downsized to end up as an ultralight. It's an easier process to design and consider a larger study prototype and get all the aerodynamics and mechanics figured out before tackling the rigors of extreme weight- trimming. [to my thinking, anyway] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie question about the spar and building | Randy | Home Built | 6 | January 21st 07 08:19 PM |
Spar workshop CD and DVD available | mat Redsell | Soaring | 0 | May 6th 04 03:52 PM |
spar varnish | Lou Parker | Home Built | 5 | May 3rd 04 04:19 PM |
F.A. Hollmann's Composite Building Books & More | BASSMANCP | Home Built | 0 | February 19th 04 01:07 PM |
Spar gluing | Lou Parker | Home Built | 26 | November 21st 03 08:29 PM |