![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote .. Including simulated damage? No, I've had damage before. I thought you meant instrument failure. Thank you. The reason I press this issue is because aviation safety is serious business. Claiming to have a high safety standard based on simulator flying only, is in my opinion close to nonsense. Why? Because the sim pilot does not run the risk of getting hurt if things go bad. The objective when training a pilot to be a safe airliner captain is not only mastering the buttons and switches, but also to achieve those skills without breaking any airplane parts in the process. Therefore actual flying training is so good. It teaches the student in the most realistic way the consequences of not yet having the required skills - with a Flight Instructor always there to keep the situation safe and coach the student on how to progress towards his goal to become a pilot. That mental attitude - grasping the consequences of a pilot failure - is one of the most important traits of a safe pilot. Ugh, I've spoken ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RANT! | wise purchaser | Owning | 2 | March 27th 07 10:04 PM |
Random thoughts 2 | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 6 | September 1st 06 05:37 AM |
A Jeppesen rant | Peter R. | Piloting | 4 | January 17th 05 03:54 AM |
Why didn't GWB [insert rant] | Jack | Military Aviation | 1 | July 15th 04 11:30 PM |
Random Hold Generator... | Tina Marie | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | November 5th 03 04:21 PM |