![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:28:47 +0100, "Borat" wrote:
I think we have to be very careful about the facts in this discussion. The data (or "Back-casting", as we used to call it) shows that temperatures worldwide have climbed incrementally in the last hundred years. The data does NOT show why this is happening, and everyone is misconstruing "educated guesses" as "facts". With respect, I tend to go with people who have been studying this for years and overall there are more scientists supporting the global warming prognosis. But how would you know? The IPCC Summary for Policymakers was written by bureaucrats with political motives. It is supposed to be a summary of the Technical Summary of Working Group 1 on the Scientific Basis of Climate Change. The Technical Summary has not been released yet as it is being rewritten TO CONFORM TO THE SUMMARY FOR POLICYMAKERS. I'm not making that up, the science will be rewritten to conform to the political document before being released in May. Fortunately, the final draft of the Technical Summary was leaked by some of the participants who were upset by the politicization of the study. It is available at www.junkscience.com among other places. Read it and you will see the Summary for Policymakers (SPM) does not reflect the Technical Summary (TS) in many places, particularly sea level rise. The worst case sea level rise by 2100 in the TS is 17 inches, not 23 inches as in the SPM, much less the 20 to 200 ft thrown around by Gore and the Associated Press. The TS states that without melting the Greenland Ice Sheet and the Antarctic Ice Sheets, the forever maximum rise is about a meter. The SPM does not mention that limit and hints that the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets could melt though the TS flatly rejects that possibility. Many of the scientists in working group one resigned over the politicization of the study, but the IPCC is still listing them as authors. You can see them interviewed in the BBC Channel 4 documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle" which is available in Google Videos and YouTube. In short, what you seem to think scientists agree on is very different from what they actually believe. You have to go past the popular media and political statements from the UN and activists to learn what is real and what is hype. Don Virginia - the only State with a flag rated "R" for partial nudity and graphic violence. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lowrance 500 opinion | d&tm | Piloting | 2 | March 17th 07 06:57 AM |
Aviation Conspiracy: CBS Spotlights Aviation's Effect On Global Warming!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 1 | August 3rd 06 07:24 PM |
Your opinion about helmets? | Dave Russell | Aerobatics | 8 | March 13th 04 02:32 PM |
Opinion on club share | Paul Folbrecht | Owning | 10 | January 8th 04 05:17 AM |
Opinion on this please | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 11 | December 24th 03 06:01 PM |