![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. I've visited that site before; the author becomes very abstract at
times, but it is useful information. Personally, as an engineer and generally 'theoretical' guy, I enjoy the abstraction... but I understand what you're saying. By pitch climbing do you mean with the yoke, or with trim adjustments? Yoke. Changing pitch attitude almost always induces phugoid oscillations, with the yoke, those oscillations are trivial (almost subconscious) to damp. Trim provides no such mechanism (without grabbing the yoke anyways), so its generally a bad idea to fly with it. For any pitch attitude change, the general rule of thumb is pitch, power, trim off pressure as necessary, in that order. If I have nose-down trim applied to go fast at my low altitude, it seems I should be able to trim slightly upwards and change altitude easily, then trim back for level flight at the new altitude. If I already have nose-up trim applied, this may not work, and eventually I'll have to add power. It sounds like you're trying to fight the simulated phugoid oscillation by using trim to make very low amplitude adjustments... This just increases the period of the oscillations, it in no way prevents them from occurring. Power is a good, 'side effect free' mechanism of doing fine trimming of your aircraft's altitude. In fact, I know instructors who advocate only ever using the power to make the final 'lock' onto a new cruise altitude, no matter what. For example, the mechanism you would use to level off from a cruise climb would be as follows: 500 feet below target altitude, push the nose forward gently to bring airspeed up to cruise airspeed. Once you've reached cruise airspeed, go ahead and trim to hold the attitude, but allow your power surplus to continue pulling you up the last hundred feet or so to your target altitude, only backing off the power the moment you reach it. The descend-to-altitude is the same procedure, only with reduced power instead (set up the aircraft in cruise attitude before you hit your target altitude at a reduced descent power setting, and allow the aircraft to settle onto target altitude before increasing power back to cruise power) I can see the theoretical advantages to this approach, but I would be lying if I said I used to religiously (I still don't keep that far ahead of the aircraft). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Methods of launch | Jim Culp | Soaring | 0 | November 20th 06 07:39 AM |
Methods of Launch | Nigel Baker | Soaring | 3 | November 17th 06 04:35 PM |
methods of lauch | Robert Gaines | Soaring | 0 | November 16th 06 01:17 AM |
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? | M | Instrument Flight Rules | 23 | May 20th 06 07:41 PM |
Pressure Altitude or Density Altitude | john smith | Piloting | 3 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |