A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Defence plan to scrap F-111s



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old August 16th 03, 09:50 AM
Brash
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oh ****. This is like trying to explain quantum physics to monkeys.
(Actually, I suspect that would be easier).

"L'acrobat" wrote in message
...

"Brash" wrote in message
u...


Actually Infantry is over sucribed, the school of cool is not that

full
these days cause there is only limited postions in the Battalions. How

often
r the Battalions being deployed? all the bloody time, how often r the

F111s
being deployed?


Obviously the finer points of Strategy are lost on you. Infantry

battalions
(especially those a "light" as ours) don't make much of a strategic
deterrent. And F111s aren't suited to peace-keeping.


again the gate guard shows his ignorance.


Seeing as I'm not a gate guard, who is being ignorant here?


The size of the Army force in Aus significantly raises the bar as to what
constitutes an effective invasion force, which consequently raises the
logistic requirements to invade Aust significantly.


That's right, you two-dimensional spastic. Australia's interests aren't
affected unless enemy troops lodge on our shore. I'd expect a lowly infantry
Private (Rtd) to think in such constrained terms. Clearly, this topic is way
out of your ability to comprehend.


Perhaps if you didn't use words that you don't understand (like

'strategy'),
you would not keep making such a fool of yourself?


Perhaps if you just spared us your "insights" and stuck to what you know
(whatever the **** that is) you wouldn't make a fool of YOURself.


Long range strike is a very useful capability for Aust,


Especially when it makes potential aggressor decide not to be aggressive in
the first place. Its little wonder you think the way you do. Its that low
level army training you've been exposed to. Sadly,, a great many army
officers display the same "understanding" until they've done a Joint Warfare
Course and learn that defending Australia doesn't start at the low-tide
mark.


but it doesn't
neccessarily need to be delivered by F-111


The only correct thing you've said all day.

and it is not the be all and end
all of deterrent.


No **** Private (Rtd) L'abortion?

--
De Oppresso Liber.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IFR Flight Plan question Snowbird Instrument Flight Rules 5 August 13th 04 12:55 AM
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan gwengler Instrument Flight Rules 4 August 11th 04 03:55 AM
IFR flight plan filing question Tune2828 Instrument Flight Rules 2 July 23rd 03 03:33 AM
USA Defence Budget Realities Stop SPAM! Military Aviation 17 July 9th 03 02:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.