![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron,
As Jim says, there's advice on that in the POH. Keep in mind that the S-TEC 50 does not intercept/capture radials or localizers. You have to get the plane onto the localizer (which can of course be done with the AP in heading mode). Only after that you can engage the approach mode. Main difference between approach and nav is the sensitivity. With the S-TEC 50, you will still have to manage the altitude profile yourself. I have seen vastly different accuracy on different installations in different aircraft with the S-TEC 50. On our Tobago, it can be used well on approaches down to 200 feet. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Autopilot | [email protected] | Piloting | 40 | January 5th 06 09:12 PM |
KAP 140 autopilot approach | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 12th 05 03:10 PM |
IMC without an autopilot | Jon Kraus | Instrument Flight Rules | 101 | April 18th 04 07:17 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Autopilot | Hankal | Owning | 1 | November 10th 03 02:21 AM |