Question for the real pilots

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nomen Nescio wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: Mxsmanic

Not that I disagree with you, but are you able to cite FAA regulations
or orders that support your allegation?

FAR 91.131(a)(1) (necessity of clearance) and 7710.65R 7-9-2(a) (approved
phraseology).

What part of the term "real pilots" confused you?



I really hate to come to Two-Tonne Tony's defense here, but he is
right as far as the .65 goes. There is the actual phraseology stated
here.

I'd also like to mention that while I am not a real pilot
(yet), I do understand the reasoning to know the regs before stepping
into the plane, so should that discriminate someone who knows it but
hasn't had the chance to apply it in the real world yet the opportunity
to answer?

Lastly, while I do flightsim, I also have more common sense to
think that flying a sim like MSFS *is real*. It is possible to get it
close to real, but it isn't. If one refuses to believe that there is a
difference, there is a problem.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGH9soyBkZmuMZ8L8RAjJuAKDZ5Feovdx41XMqnToVIp l7ue+7TQCfUO+a
ZOI9qeh4gKhIymI7NPbcMjc=
=EtG4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----