![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ray Andraka writes: If your POH supplement for the autopilot has operating limitations, it isn't legal to use contrary to those limitations. This does not conflict with "in general," and "they aren't in the FARs. 91.9 is in the FARs. "In general" doesn't mean "in the average case" or even "in most cases." It means for all cases. In addition to not knowing squat about the regulations, you don't know English. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Autopilot | [email protected] | Piloting | 40 | January 5th 06 09:12 PM |
KAP 140 autopilot approach | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 12th 05 03:10 PM |
IMC without an autopilot | Jon Kraus | Instrument Flight Rules | 101 | April 18th 04 07:17 PM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Autopilot | Hankal | Owning | 1 | November 10th 03 02:21 AM |