![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message news ![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote: NASA is an extra Constitutional entity, just like US DOT and they are identical in being Congressional authority delegated to the Executive. Do you stay up late at night making this stuff up? NASA is an agency established by the Executive branch to "execute" under the authorization and appropriations of enabling legislation enacted by the Legislative branch. There's nothing "extra Constitutional" about it. Yes Ed, Congress delegates much of its authority to the Executive. That way Administrative Law can enable the spending of money which otherwise would have to be allocated by Congress directly. Administrative "Law" is simply the power of "regulation" rather than "legislation" and is well within the existing Constitutional authority of the Executive Branch. The "enabling" to spending money is more than adequately covered by the passage of appropriation bills. That's the whole of idea of an "Executive" branch--it executes the policy legislated by the Congress. Those Federal powers in the Constitution are quite limited and intentionally so. The three branches of Government and their powers, the military, the postal service and coining money are eacmples of Constitutional entities. The Executive Branch is not there to implement the will of congress, but as a co-equal Branch of governemtn. Congressional "authority", in other words the power of the Legislative branch as described in the Constitution cannot be "delegated" to the Executive. LOL Ed, go fly an airplane and forget about trying to understand how the system works. John p. Tarver, MS/PE Electrical Engineer John, since you brandish your MS/PE in your sig, it indicates an educational accomplishment. Similarly, but not brandished, my educational accomplishments include MPS (Master of Political Science--Auburn U. 1978) and MSIR (Master of International Relations--Troy State U. 1981). I teach Political Science in Colorado Springs and you are welcome any time you pass through to visit the college and audit my classes. In that case, Ed, you certainly should be able to disearn what entities are in the Constitution and which is not. Take for example the department of Education, which is alternatively praised and then threatened with disbandment. Limiting Federal powers to those entities that are Constitutional in nature is at the heart of libertarian thought. Wheras through republican thinking, one might come to the conclusion that Federal power should be limited to those things the States are unable to deal with; under a civil free society. Then there is the democratic idea that Federal power should be unlimited and seek to satisfy the desires of the masses. I don't see how you can convey the meaning of this experiment in democracy without understanding the differences in the basic ideas of our Republic. Please educate us, educated one. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USAF axes the bicycle aerobics test | S. Sampson | Military Aviation | 22 | August 10th 03 03:50 AM |
FS Books USAF, Navy, Marine pilots and planes | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 03 02:36 AM |
NZ plane lands safely with help from USAF | Jughead | Military Aviation | 0 | July 6th 03 10:23 PM |
From Col.Greg Davis USAF (ret) | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | July 3rd 03 07:56 PM |