![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 13, 7:04 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: What I think Kilo Charlie and the others are trying to determine is if it's even worth taking a towplane to this potential site. Without experience at a similar site, looking for pertinent numbers seems like a better idea than just showing up and trying it. No, ASA has flown at the site (Clark Memorial, Williams, AZ ) before but for our next contest there the organizers have decided that water ballast will not be allowed. Some members have questioned that rule on the basis that some pilots used water ballast last time they were there and thought the risk was acceptable. I think limiting the discussion to takeoff distance misses the point. I like to know if I can expect a climb rate that will allow me to return to the airport, or other known safe landing area, from any point in the tow. Andy Eric has hit it on the head. Andy is a very knowlegable pilot but at least last year did not fly out of Williams in his glider (he came to visit in his airplane with a broken arm) just as a matter of full disclosure which seems to be where he was attempting to head. I honestly don't care which parameter you choose.....takeoff distance, climb rate, etc. I would think that it all will have a decent correlation wrt density altitude.....but then I'm just a stupid doctor and not an engineer like Andy. We have NO airports with safe bailout fields anymore....not that we ever did but Turf had a potential spot at least. So its a totally moot point re that. I have towed at gross weight out of Ely (6200'), Parowan (5900') and Moriarty (6200') and yes the takeoff rolls were long and the climb rates were low but by the end of the runway or just beyond was at 200 feet and the experienced tow pilots did a slow low bank turn back over the airport until we were at a high enough altitude to look for lift elsewhere. I never felt that my life was in more danger there than on a 110 degree day at 2000' towing uphill with no wind at El Tiro which we do all of the time. The ASA is also now towing out of a 3900' length runway uphill on the lee side of some hills. So where do we draw the line? So I do think that Eric is correct in that I do wish to have the best numbers we can generate wrt takeoff distances (or climb rate!) so that we have a starting point to evaluate a go, no-go situation whether it be heading to a high site on a very hot AZ weekend or whether or how much water we may put in. The data would be helpful....period. If the naysayers wish to ignore that its their choice. I for one believe my POH and along with some common sense will be following it for my Columbia on hot days and would like to be able to use it for my LS-8/Pawnee combo too. Casey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
measuring arm distances | Heino & Deanne Weisberg | Home Built | 1 | October 21st 05 05:49 PM |
Stuck at work--need takeoff/landing distances for a 172 please | Yossarian | Piloting | 12 | July 14th 05 01:12 PM |
Edge distances in steel | Ed Wischmeyer | Home Built | 3 | August 24th 04 10:53 PM |
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | General Aviation | 32 | March 25th 04 02:32 PM |
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | Piloting | 36 | March 25th 04 02:32 PM |