![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 3:32 pm, "JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote:
Denny wrote: In retrospect, I also wonder what the insurance company would have had to say if anything had gone wrong? Tom We are getting deep into 'what if's', but think it through... The Ins. Co. says the plane must be kept legally airworthy to be covered for inflight risk... Who defines what is/not airworthy - the FAA... The form you have from the FAA says it IS legally airworthy for the duration of that listed flight... Maybe not. Every policy I've had stated that the airplane must comply with its standard airworthiness certificate. If it's out of annual, it's out of compliance. A special airworthiness certificate (represented by the Ferry Permit) is not the same as the standard airworthiness certificate. At least according to the aviation insurance policies I've had experience with. I've made flights under ferry permits and in all cases, the insurance companies had to approve the flight and fax a waiver. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) All of you raise very valid issues and there is abit of debate of exactly how many forms, permits, and signatures are required when "ferrying" a plane that has airworthy issues flagged. So I go back to my original post...... You can either A) "suck it up" and let the 1st shop do the work, OR B) go thru the process that we both described with ferry permits, etc. But if you choose B, in addition to the hassles of permits, signatures, reviews, etc., you have to ask yourself whether taking it someplace else will really make enough of a difference to make all those time-consuming hassles worthwhile? In the end, will you save $50 or 50%?? In our case, we figured we save $50 not 50% so it wasn't worth the hassle. --Jeff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TBO and airworthiness | Jim Stewart | Owning | 26 | April 17th 07 05:05 PM |
Midwest Unairworthy Propeller Source? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 10 | September 8th 05 03:29 PM |
Midwest Unairworthy Propeller Source? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 10 | September 8th 05 03:29 PM |
Midwest Unairworthy Propeller Source? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 10 | September 8th 05 03:29 PM |
KLN94 "Flagged" When Database Out of Date | AMW | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | September 14th 04 05:20 PM |