![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JStONGE123 wrote:
Why was the P-51 not used on aircraft carriers during WWII? Beside the obvious no tail hook.....ect. From "Duels in the Sky," by Eric Brown: "Landing the Mustang required concentration, for at an approach speed of 105 mph the view was bad, and high-rebound-ratio landing gear made a three-point landing tricky. This state of affairs was exacerbated by the aircraft's lack of directional stability on the landing run. The U.S. Navy abandoned the Mustang's deck-landing trials on an aircraft carrier for this reason." BTW, all USAAF fighters were fitted with catapult spools for at least a while in the late war years, to allow them to be delivered to bases by flying them off escort carriers, instead of having to crane them off. Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |