Legality of owning ex-military intercontinental aircraft.

What they gona do with more Buffs? hand them over to the USAF so they
can fly after 30yrs of no service?

as if..


sound like governmental policies gone mad...


if that the case i will withdraw all my tax money from the govt at short
notice to if needs be and refuse to support people who inflict self and
induced harm by drinking, smoking and drugs and let them die instead...
i rather see drunks, drug addicts which include all smokers and let
therm flounder in their own pile of death.

simple as... its a absurd policy then clinging onto aircraft which have
no direct impact for the USAF is like mad

whats next they want their ww2 era C-47 B-17 aircraft back to bomb north
korea? even include the 80yr aircrews ....just to add some flavour...

surely theyd enjoy it...one last trip before they go to the big airshow
in sky...





BUFDRVR wrote:

It would have to be demilled sufficiently so it would not be a military
threat, but otherwise it wouldn't be much different to owning any other
warbird. Just more expensive.


With the exception of B-52s. Even B-52 display aircraft are accounted for in
START II and a limit set at a specific number. Additionally, *all* B-52 display
aircraft are owned by the Air Force Museum. You may pay for refurbishment, you
may pay to keep it looking good, but tommorow the Air Force Museum can come and
take it back.

BUFDRVR

"Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips
everyone on Bear Creek"

--