![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-04-25 08:33:38 -0700, Peter Clark
said: On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:16:07 -0700, C J Campbell wrote: If this is a pressurized Skymaster you might as well get the pressurized and high altitude sign-offs as well. Does the pressurized Skymaster have a service ceiling in excess of FL250? No, you are right. The service ceiling is only 19,500 feet. I had forgotten about this limitation, but I think it was because of the windows, which were never really optimal for pressurized flight. The Skymaster is a fun airplane to fly, although it has its oddities. It is nice and roomy and easy to get in and out of. The pressurized versions are not great photography planes, of course. Rear visibility suffers some. There have been some problems with overheating of the rear engine while taxiing, so some pilots have taxied with only the front engine and then forgotten to start the rear before taking off. The Skymaster will take off on one engine, but it needs a lot more runway. One of the only airplanes I ever saw crash was an O-2, the military version of the Skymaster. The doggone thing collapsed its nose gear on touchdown at Clark AB in the Philippines. The pilot managed to eject, but the plane balled itself up. Pilot had a broken leg. Man, that guy was ticked. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skymaster-type kits? | Home Built | 7 | January 24th 04 12:23 AM | |
Pressurized Skymaster | Owning | 2 | August 31st 03 04:08 PM |