![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith wrote:
The spin is not the problem. The spin is a low speed maneuver as the inside wing is stalled while the outside wing is flying. The steep spiral dive at high speed can lead to airframe damage. This was a topic in the acro community a couple of years ago. Many pilots believed that the airframe g-loading ratings applied to all attitudes of flight. It was the T-34 the accident that that had the Baron wing replacement that set off the discussion. From that we learned that the g-loadings only applied to wings level flight. High angle of bank and high airspeed will result in wing failure below the manufacturers publish g-loading limit. I was suggesting a steep spiral dive within reasonable flight parameters. I practice these occasionally and I haven't bent the plane yet. In a stabilize spiral, the G-loading on the wings should be the same as Gs applied in level flight. The reason I prefer the manuever is that it gets you down faster than a lower airspeed descent (i.e. flaps out). Plus, there is the possibility the that the higher airspeed could over-oxygenate the fire and put it out. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via AviationKB.com http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200704/1 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|