![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
But if the boat sinks, you probably have a life jacket, life raft, life boat, maybe people in the area to assist, etc., in other words you might survive without the boat or ship. This might be true if the Queen Mary sinks today. It wasn't true when the Niña, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria sailed. They had each other, and that was about it. If one, or all, of the ships had sunk, some may have survived in a long boat, or even a hunk of mast floating, but the *point* being, they weren't instantly, automatically doomed when the ship sunk. They still had a chance, and giving odds of those chances are totally out the window, as simply having any chance beats no chance. =They= were pioneers. People on the Queen Mary are tourists. Yeah, no argument there, how'd the QM get in this? I have NO argument against any bona fide explorer (there have been some frauds) or pioneer who ever lived, or ever will live - my position is that the ones operating on terra firma (or to a lesser degree water) have an advantage over someone operating in a vacumn @ plus/minus 2-300º (or whatever) millions of miles from earth. That's it! It's not NASA blaspheme, or condemning space travel, or setting back the human race. Trust me. I think the folks in the past have done an unbelievable job - there is absolutely no doubt their ideas of what was looming ahead was a hell of a lot scarier than what we have, since we have a damn good idea what's there, and precisely where it's at, we just don't know what's going to happen en route. Actually, somebody took off before Lindburgh. They had three people (IIRC), three motors (a tri-motor Folker), and never made it. So much for "good chance - ok, fair chance..."). Lindburgh had a one-in-four chance (in hindsight). If Lindy would have stayed on course and run out of fuel, he may have at least been over Ireland, or within sight of France - again 1:4 beats 0:0 odds if your machine quits. I'd love to believe there was another inhabitable piece of real estate besides earth, but so far I haven't seen a shred of evidence There's at least as much evidence as there was to Columbus. Sending humans 44 million miles with a gigantic payload, after our robotic rovers and mapping satellites have shown Mars to be another Death Valley on steriods just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Then don't go. But don't try to stop others from going... even on your... well I was going to say "dime" but really, it's "tenth of a hundreth of a penny". How the hell would I stop others? But by George, now you've done it! I wouldn't go now if they begged me! You could even throw in a book deal, and I will NOT take it. A guest appearance on Bowling For Dollars, maybe..... d:-)) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to fly on planet Mars ??? | Tristan Beeline | Aerobatics | 0 | June 14th 05 10:50 AM |
Soaring on Mars? | Roy Clark, B6 | Soaring | 5 | March 27th 05 09:45 AM |
I fly on Mars | Tom-Alex Soorhull | General Aviation | 1 | May 15th 04 07:37 AM |
First Man on Mars | Julious Cesar | Military Aviation | 15 | February 19th 04 11:40 PM |
Soaring on Mars | puffnfresh | Soaring | 21 | September 3rd 03 11:24 AM |