A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vietnam era F-4s Q



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old September 2nd 03, 08:57 PM
Scott R. Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Radar beacon mode is a different animal altogether than the IFF
interrogators we've been talking about. The rendezvous beacon that tankers
carried and the one carried in F-4s (SST-181X, sometimes called "Skyspot
Beacon" though I don't know if that name's official) are interrogated by the
radar itself using a selected radar PW/PRF as I recall, not a separate
interrogator as with APX-76 or 81. The beacon in the F-4 had a code that
had to be preset before the flight by maintenance since it was dialed in on
the SST-181X itself, which was buried inside Door 19. I don't know what
kind of beacon the tankers carried or whether it was accessible in flight.
Lots of US military aircraft radars can interrogate rendezvous beacons.
Even the APN-59 radar in the C-130 could do it, though cargo Herks had no
IFF interrogation capability.
Scott Wilson

"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
(Smartace11) wrote:


I presume you meant APX-76 for tanker join-ups? Combat Tree wouldn't

seem to
be
useful for them, unless our KC-135s were carrying Soviet IFF systems


At that time the whole system was called Combat Tree, as least by the

aircrews.
I was a dumb crew dog and just flew the things


I'll go with Guy on this one. The beacon mode of the E-model radar we
were using at Korat sure wasn't Tree. It worked on 100 and 200 mile
scope and was nice for finding your tanker. But it was strictly
"cooperative" target recognition.

I used to tweak Rod Bates, my back-seater after Linebacker II, to take
tanker "judy" as far out as he could. If he could get the tank to
squawk, he'd try to judy in the turn out of traffic. He got some
contacts at 125 to 150 miles and ran the whole intercept.

Of course, the beacon return on that long a range was a wide slash on
the scope. It got you going in the right general direction and you got
a refined return as you closed the range. By the time you got to skin
point you would be right on track.

Sorry bout this one, Steve, you're old memory is fading. CRS, I guess.



Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (ret)
***"When Thunder Rolled:
*** An F-105 Pilot Over N. Vietnam"
*** from Smithsonian Books
ISBN: 1588341038



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Vietnam The Helicopter War Large HC Book 189p Disgo Aviation Marketplace 0 February 6th 04 05:19 PM
Dogfights in Vietnam Mike Military Aviation 11 July 30th 03 09:47 PM
Australia tries to rewrite history of Vietnam War Evan Brennan Military Aviation 34 July 18th 03 11:45 PM
Trying to make sense of Vietnam air war Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 6th 03 11:13 PM
Vietnam search to continue to find remains of Waterford pilot Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 2nd 03 10:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.