![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/4/2007 1:19:37 PM, Luke Skywalker wrote:
I think that your instincts are pretty good here. I guess my primary point, which may not have come across in the original post, is that if ATC has the ability to provide weather avoidance, pilots of a less-equipped aircraft (including the subject of this thread) should be very thankful to accept that service rather than go about it on his/her own. The clip I am putting together will hopefully back up my impression that the pilot believed his Garmin 396 was a real-time radar with capabilities similar to the commercial carriers' type. To counter his impression, my experience as an IFR pilot over the last five years demonstrates that even airline pilots will take all the ATC weather avoidance assistance provided, despite having their own real-time radar on board and assuming those vectors don't conflict with the pilots' weather perspective. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radio "Squelch-type" Noise | Kensandyeggo | Owning | 7 | April 12th 06 07:20 PM |
jeppesen "aviation weather" book | Mike | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | March 26th 06 08:09 PM |