![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 5, 3:49 pm, "gatt" wrote:
I'm not being a big-government socialist when I say that the federal bureaucracy could run the oil industry at lower user cost. (Not necessarily more efficiently, but in ways that are less damaging to the US economy, transportation industries, etc.) -c JEEEEEEEPPPPPERS!!! Don't EVER say that out loud! You've seen how well the feds have run aviation lately, and then say that they might run oil companies at a lower cost??? What's in your water? (OK, insert half a smiley here....) We know how thick the paperwork and regs books are just to fly a little ol' plane from point A to point B. I can't imaigine how bad the oil business would be if the job-justifying feds started running it. jeez... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You can tell high fuel prices ... | john smith | Piloting | 0 | August 17th 06 07:09 PM |
High fuel prices = buyer's market? | Greg Copeland[_1_] | Owning | 22 | August 7th 06 11:15 AM |
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |
'Chicken-Hawk' argument doesn't fly | Vaughn | Military Aviation | 1 | February 24th 04 10:47 PM |
'Chicken-Hawk' argument doesn't fly | Vaughn | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 24th 04 11:18 AM |