![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dallas" wrote in message ... Am I reading this graph incorrectly? http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...ofileChart.jpg At the 45% power setting, the best range for a Cessna 150M would be achieved by flying anywhere from sea level to a maximum of 1,800 feet? At 75% power the gain is about 2.5 NM of range by flying at 7,000 feet vs. 1,000 feet. This pretty much trashes my fundamental belief that higher altitudes give greater range. What am I missing? -- Dallas If you stay at 45%, the climb to altitude takes a looooong time, and you are moving slowly, so the range suffers. I think most CAFE folks have figured out the best thing to do is climb at max power, get to a high altitude quickly, then throttle back at the high altitude to get the max fuel economy. YMMV. Regards, John Severyn KLVK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
angle of approach or landing range question | Tim923 | Piloting | 27 | November 12th 06 03:24 AM |
Fifty Percent Solution for MV-22A Seems Radical Enough Right Now. | Henry J Cobb | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 18th 06 05:04 PM |
Radio Range Question | Charles Wood | Piloting | 7 | September 9th 05 01:08 AM |
Radio Range Question | Charles Wood | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | September 7th 05 12:34 AM |
Fifty six who risked it all for freedom | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 4th 03 02:58 AM |