|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
June 8th 07, 10:24 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Argument against high gas prices
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... Ah, yeah. All the people talking about it all the time aren't really concerned. Sure they are talking about it. But when push comes to shove they still drive the same way they did when gas was 1.50/gal. No they don't. For instance: General aviation. Pretty soon, only the wealthy will be able to afford it. That will hurt the folks making $25,000 teaching them to fly, and the businesses that are struggling to make ends meet, but it sure won't hurt the super wealthy. At 10gph, I'd fly a hell of a lot more if fuel was 1.50/gallon. To me this seems abundantly obvious. -c 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| You can tell high fuel prices ... | john smith | Piloting | 0 | August 17th 06 07:09 PM |
| High fuel prices = buyer's market? | Greg Copeland[_1_] | Owning | 22 | August 7th 06 11:15 AM |
| IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |
| 'Chicken-Hawk' argument doesn't fly | Vaughn | Military Aviation | 1 | February 24th 04 10:47 PM |
| 'Chicken-Hawk' argument doesn't fly | Vaughn | Naval Aviation | 0 | February 24th 04 11:18 AM |
Threaded Mode