![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
My primary concern with the Puchacz/Perkoz design would be the big canopy frame obstructing the back seat pilot's vision. Never flown either, but it looks substantial, and right in the field of vision. I've ridden back seat in the Puchacz once or twice. Rear vision is a bit restricted, but the main thing I noticed was internal reflections in that long, glass tunnel. There's one possible disadvantage that I'm surprised the nobody has mentioned: replacing Puchacz/Perkoz canopies is much more expensive than replacing K-21 or G.103 canopies due to the sheer single piece size. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the Oz 3 surface trainer | patrick mitchel | Home Built | 2 | May 15th 07 03:19 AM |
WTB Trainer | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 0 | June 25th 06 04:50 PM |
***XC-Trainer Offer*** | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | August 24th 05 05:21 PM |
AMD Alarus IFR Trainer | H.P. | Owning | 0 | August 5th 04 07:10 PM |
AMD Alarus IFR Trainer | H.P. | Piloting | 0 | August 5th 04 07:10 PM |