![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
ArtKramr wrote:
Subject: More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with From: Guy Alcala he also says that Mitchell wanted to stick with the tailskid, but the Air Ministry insisted on the tailwheel, because they knew (but couldn't tell Mitchell at the time, because it was classified) that they were going to lay down all-weather (i.e. paved) runways at all the fighter bases, and the tail skid wouldn't last long under those conditions. This thing's just filled with great info. Guy It seems as though the Air Ministry didn't entirely trust Mitchell. Imagine being an aircraft designer and having th air ministry withhold info that would impact on your designs. The mind boggles. It wasn't a case of trust, just a case of need to know. Mitchell only needed to know that a tailwheel was a firm requirement, not the rationale behind it, to design one. I imagine the spec change to increase the armament from 4 to 6 or 8 x ..303s was handled the same way -- they told him what they wanted and asked him if it could be done, but probably not the reasoning behind it. Whether the tailwheel case was an example of the government being classification happy is another matter; the Brits tended to be (and still are, to a great extent) a lot more reluctant about releasing such details, even when they're apparently innocuous, than we were/are. OTOH, there were some probably unnecessary security concerns over Mitchell's technical assistant, S/Ldr H.J. 'Agony' Payn, AFC RAF (ret) because he'd divorced and his second wife was foreign (maybe German; I forget). After Mitchell died he was named manager of the Design Department at Supermarine (not Chief Designer, the post which Mitchell had held). The Air Ministry forced Supermarine to remove him from work on the Spitfire or anything else classified because of this, and in fact the company fired him. Supermarine tried two different designs, a single wheel and one with dual wheels (side by side). The latter tended to get clogged with mud, so they went with the single. Guy |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 10:14 AM |