![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's worth remembering the Mooney 201 was pretty much a cleaned up
Mooney Executive. All of the minor things added a nice amount of airspeed to the basic airplane. We've looked at the newer Mooneys that get hauled along the sky behind an IO 540. Our 201 uses an IO 360, and cruises really nicely at 9 GPH. I think the increased engine size doesn't much help our typical flight. I do think we have to cancel 8% or so of our far in advance planned trips, and wonder if the newer airplane's range, altitude, and the like would change that much. But going from 8% to 4% cancellations is probably not worth the incremental cost, On Jun 21, 7:45 pm, john smith wrote: When one looks at the small gains in airspeed from each existing speed mod kit, you have to say that, for the most part, the original designer got it right. Having said that, I still would like to see the manufacturers do factory cleanups of existing designs, still in production. The Bonanza is a very clean design, but I can't help but wonder if there are a few more knots to be eaked out by redesigning the nose bowl. Those big air inlets designed in the 1940's and 1950's just don't look right. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airframe Construction DVD | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | December 3rd 06 01:40 AM |
Airframe Construction DVD | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | December 3rd 06 01:36 AM |
Airframe Construction DVD | [email protected] | Restoration | 0 | December 3rd 06 01:31 AM |
Airframe Construction DVD | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 3rd 06 12:31 AM |
airframe basics | Mike | Piloting | 6 | June 7th 06 04:37 PM |