![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 06:59:57 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote: According to Richard Collins, the biggest harzard in IFR is the transition to the approach. IOW, fly the whole thing IFR. One of several things I would disagree with RC about. Well, he based his statement on some rather lengthy and in-depth research in the the NTSB records.... (maybe you've had some revelation?). No revelations. Only common sense. My own reviews, and the opinions of others, have indicated an increased hazard during the transition, at the *TERMINATION* of an approach, from IMC to the visual phase. If Collins actually stated that there is a hazard in the "transition TO the approach", it is difficult to understand why that transition would be any more difficult if the preceding segment were flown under visual versus instrument flight rules. So far as the transition from IMC to visual conditions at the end of an approach is concerned, as with any other facet of flying, practice of THAT phase of flight is a good way to help the problem. I do believe that flying within the system, and using the IFR system, is helpful (even in VMC) in polishing communication skills, dealing with ATC, and perhaps in dealing with some of the regulatory issues. But that's all. In my personal opinion, the most critical part of any flight in IMC is the pre-flight planning, and the go/no-go decision. Do that properly and the flight becomes simple. Part of that planning is an honest assessment of the pilot and his abilities at that particular time. Do you comprehend the meaning of the words "As much as possible"? What you wrote was "Also, fly as much IFR as you can; even in CAVU, it keeps you sharp and provides some practice so that IMC is not such a SHOCK!" Explain to me how flying IFR in CAVU conditions makes you better able to execute an approach to minimums, perhaps followed by a miss and a diversion to your alternate, and also deal with the transition from IMC to VMC at the end of the approach? Again, if IMC is a "such a SHOCK", the cure is to fly in IMC -- either real or simulated (using a simulator or safety pilot and a GOOD view-limiting device) -- until it is not such a SHOCK. If the problem is communication and procedures, then using the system in CAVU may have some benefit. --ron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars Hit The Road in the USA | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 06 03:48 AM |
" BIG BUCKS" WITH ONLY A $6.00 INVESTMENT "NO BULL"!!!! | [email protected] | Piloting | 3 | March 17th 05 01:23 PM |
ARROW INVESTMENT | MARK | Owning | 9 | March 18th 04 08:10 PM |
aviation investment. | Walter Taylor | Owning | 4 | January 18th 04 09:37 PM |
Best Oshkosh Investment | EDR | Piloting | 3 | November 4th 03 10:24 PM |