![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Clark" wrote in message ... On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:02:51 -0700, "Al G" wrote: FWIW, the latest Cessna 182T POH shows the flap motor and indicating system as required in the KOEL for day/night/ifr/vfr. If I read that correctly, technically departing with the flaps known inop in one without a special airworthiness certificate would be a violation.... I would go along with that, depending on the operation. It may be that a steep instrument approach is easier with flaps, and then I would insist they work. The 182 is also a bit heavier than the 172 and the flaps help slow the touchdown. Never the less, it is left to me to decide, and for a 172 I stand by my statement, even to a FSDO. Maybe I'm just not as intimidated by them as I used to be. I have flown the '66 172 I rent without flaps, and would do it again. KOEL=?? Kinds Of Operations Equipment List. It's contained in Section 2 of the POH (AKA Operating Limits) and is prefaced: "The Cessna 182T Nav III airplane is approved for day and night, VFR and IFR operations. Flight into known-icing conditions is prohibited. The minimum equipment for approved operatons required under the Operating Rules are defined by 14 CFR Part 91 and 14 CFR Part 135, as applicable. The following Kinds of Operations Equipment List (KOEL) identifies the equipment required to be operational for airplane airworthiness in the listed kind of operations." Basically, the lawyers have set it up so that Nav III aircraft have stricter limits on what equipment is required than in the older aircraft that you're used to by creating a KOEL (effectively a MEL). The way it was explained to me is that just like a MEL, in these ones (and I'm pretty sure the 172 Nav III has it as well but don't have a POH or IM handy) since the flap motor and indicator are listed as required by the table in the limitations section, they have to be working or you're not in fact airworthy - regardless of the operation. The POH has effectively removed the decision from you in an aircraft with a MEL or KOEL. So if the flap switch is inop, you're good to go? Al G |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cowl Flaps | N114RW | Home Built | 0 | June 27th 07 09:25 PM |
What are cowl flaps? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 31 | October 27th 06 04:28 PM |
Fowler flaps? | TJ400 | Home Built | 20 | May 19th 06 02:15 AM |
FLAPS | skysailor | Soaring | 36 | September 7th 05 05:28 AM |
FLAPS-Caution | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 05 04:10 AM |