![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-07-11, Gig 601XL Builder wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote:
Justin Gombos wrote: On 2007-07-03, Gig 601XL Builder wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: Robert M. Gary wrote: I also doubt you are going to find a carrier that would be willing to start a policy every Friday and end it on Sunday. That's not what I was looking for anyway. I would be more interested in an annual policy that is effectively excludes flying incidents Monday-Thursday. But that is pretty much what they'd be doing anyway. What makes you think that your risk flying 50 hours per year only on weekend would be any less than the guy in the next hanger who flys 50 hours a year but on any day of the week? If insurers were counting hours, this discussion would be moot. They may be estimating hours in their formula, but the accuracy of that estimate is terrible if the same number is being used for a weekend pilot as a daily pilot. In fact since there will be more recreational pilots flying on weekend the chance that you would run into one of them increases. Sure, but that risk is the same for a pilot insured daily flying on the weekend (neglecting the experience factor, which is a variable that's already accounted for in the premium). There would also be the added concern that on one of your weekend jaunts you would be more likely to fly in worst weather because waiting until Monday isn't an option. I disagree. A pilot willing to fly in unsafe weather will have more opportunities to do so if they can fly every day. The pilot confined to weekend travel only flies weekends for a reason. If their schedule prevents them from flights on workdays, then being insured on weekdays doesn't make the better weather flight time any more viable. But it all boils down to the fact that the insurance company's risk would not be reduced enough for you to even notice the difference. That's a reasonable speculation, but I'm more inclined to think the very small market and lack of competition is preventing insurers from taking advantage of this. If no provider breaks the 365 day insurance trend, all providers can collect artificially high premiums from weekend pilots. -- PM instructions: do a caesar cipher on the alpha characters in my address using +3 as the key. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insuring a C310 vs. Piper Seneca | Dave | Owning | 17 | October 27th 04 03:29 PM |
Airports Around Columbia SC | S Ramirez | Piloting | 16 | December 24th 03 12:08 PM |
columbia anyone disciplined? | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 2 | September 15th 03 03:58 AM |
be careful if you fly in Columbia | EDR | Piloting | 0 | August 20th 03 05:43 PM |
Age Wasn't a Cause of the Columbia Disaster | blackfire | Military Aviation | 0 | July 15th 03 01:21 AM |