![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , phil hunt
writes On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:00:06 +0100, Paul J. Adam news@jrwlyn ch.demon.co.uk wrote: Too vague to be useful, then. It's some use. 1/4 would mean detection range is decreased by 30% At what frequency and over what extent? Is this a narrow little null, an averaged plot, or actually a nasty nose flash? You're just not going to get *useful* RCS data in the public domain. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |