![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:23:15 -0500, Barnyard BOb --
wrote: No one is accusing anyone of having their head in the sand, but given the millions of hours Lycoming and Continental have been flown and tracked over the years, any backyard data base by a couple of conversion enthusiasts is insignificant and quite suspect in the scheme of things. The FAA and the AD system far exceeds anything you or Bruce can begin to track regarding auto conversion world faux pas. My sincere apologies if I implied that you accused anyone of having their heads in the sand. That was intended as my reference to myself and anyone else who would rather charge ahead with a project without first ascertaining what, if anything, has gone before and where the failure modes are. That just seemed logical to me. Further... The Ford engine is but one conversion and not a popular one. Whatever its record is, or can be... it ain't good enough for the majority of folks interested in converting auto engines today. As far as I'm concerned, you Ford guys are riding a dead horse and the Chevy boyz fall out of the sky with alarming alacrity. It isn't dead to me. The parts are still available and the only reason I'm using it is because so many are flying. The concept that we're "riding a dead horse" is interesting. If that's the case then what does that say about the Lycoming/Continentals? I'd rather be using a Chevy, only because there are more aftermarket parts available for it, but it's heavier than the Ford, unless you buy an aluminum block. And then the cost is prohibitive and it may still be heavier. Feel all warm and fuzzy with your minuscule knowledge/data base, if you must. Your Ford defense is a hoot.... and moot. Barnyard BOb -- 51 years of flight. The Database is small compared to Lycosaurs, no question about that. But the database for them (Lycosaurs) was exceedingly small at one time too, back when they were first introduced. There isn't anything inherently wrong with the concept of using an auto conversion. An engine is an engine as long is it's run within it's design parameters. But you can't just bolt a prop to Mom's salvaged grocery shuttle V-6 and expect it to work like an IO-360-L2A. The devil is in the details. That's why the subject keeps being discussed, that's why Bruce and others persist in printing newsletters, a thankless task by the way. People need to know the latest information. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's the best auto gas for a/c use in California? | [email protected] | Home Built | 12 | September 17th 03 08:47 PM |
Fuel pressure Problems | smf | Home Built | 3 | September 7th 03 08:25 PM |
Christen Fuel Pump troubleshooting | ShawnD2112 | Aerobatics | 4 | August 17th 03 12:08 PM |
Barnyard--- Auto engines | Jerry Springer | Home Built | 10 | August 8th 03 06:38 PM |
Question ~ Does fuel injection add weight? | Barnyard BOb -- | Home Built | 0 | July 6th 03 09:47 PM |