![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
AeroLEDs is introducing a new high intensity LED wing-tip landing/ recognition light at Oshkosh 2007. Dang it, Dean, you had me going for a while, but for two things: - Non-certified. Can't use it in my plane. - Price. $850 (for 2) buys a whole bunch of Q4509s. Jay.. I feel compelled to chime in here. While my flying hours have slacked off significantly in the past 3-4 years as I've spent most of my money and time doing an experimental build, I've got about 500 hours, and well over 1/4 of that was at night. I bought a high intensity discharge landing light for our project and installed it in the nose of the velocity. Scratch that.. i bought a TAXI light.. not the landing beam. The Taxi beam with HID was still able to illuminate further forward than the halogen or quartz incandescent landing lights, and in addition gave me wider coverage than the "spot" landing beams. From 100 yards away, the beam is still bright enough in daylight to leave spots in your vision when you look at it. And I paid around $400 for it. But its power draw is less than the regular incandescent bulbs, and its got a bulb life that is supposed to be over a thousand hours. I intend to leave it on for the duration of most of our flights - day, night, only switch it off if/when flying ifr causes reflection in the cockpit. I expect a big increase in the ability of other folks to see me, especially in the congested Houston area terminal airspace. The benefits? a LONG time between having to change out bulbs, not having to execute a night landing with the relatively frequent risk of a burnt out bulb, then landing and taxiing in the dark. If I chose not to use the bulb 100% of the time, and only for takeoff, landing and ground ops, it likely would be a lifetime bulb, good for the life of the airframe. Even in the past two years, when i've flown less than 40 hours combined, I've had two burnt out bulbs on the rentals I was flying. Try buying a bulb on sunday when you have to get home sunday night. Not required for non commercial ops, but how often does the average pilot PRACTICE landing with no landing light, particularly at a field with minimal lighting? So yes. These new fangled bulbs - both LED and HID - cost a bunch more. But you are very likely buying a device that will last for years on your airframe, and outperforms the $10 "disposable" landing lights hands down. To me, its worth it. To you, if you fly VFR Day, nice weather only, it may never be an issue. Had we been at a different point in our build (we are doing engine testing now, and shopping for DAR's) I would have been VERY interested in putting high intensity LED position lights in our wingtips for ground visibilty and in-flight anticollision purposes. Also, the noncertified issue can be addressed through field approvals. I've heard they've gotten much more difficult lately, depending on where you are. But once one person has it, its easier for the next to get it based on their data. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oshkosh for a day | Nathan Young | Home Built | 6 | July 25th 05 04:07 AM |
Oshkosh | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 2 | July 11th 05 11:35 PM |
Oshkosh: which day? | Nathan Young | Piloting | 1 | July 20th 04 02:10 PM |
SSA at EAA Oshkosh 7/28-8/04 | Burt Compton | Soaring | 2 | July 22nd 03 03:07 PM |
CQ Oshkosh, CQ Oshkosh | Warren & Nancy | Piloting | 4 | July 3rd 03 06:42 PM |