![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote:
Scott Ferrin wrote: "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Mike Marron" wrote: I don't know how much an F-4 ECM pod weighs, but I do know that it would require a hellacious amount of G's to cause the bolts that fasten the pod to the airframe to fail. How could you possibly know that? Math. ...and a near-religious faith that new bolts are just as strong as old bolts, while corrosion never happens and flightline troops never make mistakes. Why y'all respond to the dreaded "tarv troll" is beyond me! In any event, Chad, you're absolutely correct that flightline troops make mistakes. But the good folks in St. Louis at the McDonnell Douglas plant have a few scruples to speak of and you can rest assurred that they designed the F-4's ECM pod with hamfisted pilots and/or hairy-assed line mechanics in mind. With regards to your comments about threaded areas and/or corrosion possibly weakening the ECM attachment points, as you know AN hardware comes in a wide variety of different flavors and anything prone to corrosion is generally cadmium plated. And AN bolts have "rolled" threads (as opposed to "cut" threads) which results in a strengthening of the bolt in the thread area. But once again, doubtful the "brainy" types in St. Louis designed the ECM pod fasteners to take shear loads in the threaded area anyway (it is a bad practice to do this with any bolt, AN or otherwise). From a practical standpoint even if you took took an AN bolt and clamped it in a vice then punished it with a sledgehammer, you'd find that you could exceed the yield strength without actually breaking the bolt as it would stretch or bend quite a bit before snapping. The bottom line is that, yeah, I actually DO have a "near-religious faith" in AN hardware since it's my own butt hanging from one single solitary AN6-44 bolt when flying my own personal homebuilt aircraft that's rated to +6, -3 G's. I don't simply wrench on A/C and sign 'em over to some guinea pig to test fly, I actually fly A/C that I worked on, modified, or constructed myself. I'm not claiming to have flown an F-4, but that's how I know that it would require a hellacious amount of G's to cause the bolts that fasten the ECM pod to the F-4's airframe to fail. Film at 11. Cool. I assume it's a film showing an F-4 ECM pod departing the airframe in Vietnam as you said? -Mike Marron A&P, CFII, UFI (fixed-wing, weightshift, land & sea) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Making your own canopy | c hinds | Home Built | 6 | November 22nd 04 09:10 AM |
Why is a standard hold right turns? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | August 28th 04 06:09 PM |
need advice with composite for making glare shield | bubba | Home Built | 1 | July 7th 04 05:44 AM |
Making my landing gear | Lou Parker | Home Built | 8 | March 31st 04 10:34 PM |
Air Force launches rocket with secret military payload from Cape Canaveral | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 09:07 PM |