![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Once inside BEVEY you're good for 680. There is no glideslope and it's "Dive
and Drive." That's why the pros make it in with no trouble, they can read charts. Karl Karl "Hamish Reid" wrote in message ... In article , "karl gruber" wrote: I see no problem with the weather 800/3 as you point out. Inside BEVEY drive down to 680 outside CULVE, and have 3 miles to descend 505 feet. Any jet will do that all day long. So you'd drop below 1120 *outside* CULVE? Even if you were just cutting things a little fine, the 2.4 miles from CULVE is from the *far end* of the runway you're landing on... and if you were descending below 1120 just inside BEVEY in IMC, you might be in more trouble than you'd like. Hamish |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
first approach in IMC | G. Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 12th 05 02:14 AM |
No FAF on an ILS approach...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | December 24th 03 03:54 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Brief an approach | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | October 14th 03 12:10 AM |