![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Bob Gardner" wrote: I hate to blow Karl's cover, but he flies a jet for the Microsoft millionaire who just visited the space station for 25 million bucks. He and I flew for the same FBO before most of you guys were born. And yet he can look at the (relatively simple) KSMO VOR / GPS approach chart and misread it to the point where he's confidently heaping crap on anyone who disagrees with his very basic misreading of it. At least he finally and graciously appologised for all that. Seriously, though, can anyone look at the chart and really think it's safe (let alone legal) to go much below 1120 immediately after BEVEY in IMC? As I've said earlier in this thread, I've worked in the buildings that represent the charted obstructions not far from the centerline of that approach, and it scares the hell out of me that a supposedly seasoned ATP can be so far off in his reading of that chart. Hamish |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR approach SMO | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 124 | August 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
first approach in IMC | G. Sylvester | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 12th 05 02:14 AM |
No FAF on an ILS approach...? | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | December 24th 03 03:54 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Brief an approach | Ditch | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | October 14th 03 12:10 AM |