![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 5, 11:46 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
That's for the early airplanes regarding the Skymasters. the loss was in cooling drag, which Cessna improved. After that the SE ceiling cruise and climb were virtually identical, but the reputation the rear engine had for better SE performance never went away.. How can that be? The engine cowling has the same openings wether the engine is turning or not. In other words, whatever the drag of the front engine cowling, it should be the same whether the engine is turning or not. I'm assuming that the propeller does not effect airflow tooooo much near the root, where it spins slowly and has a less aerodynamic shape than near the tip, where most thrust is generated. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
monitoring pusher props | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 11 | May 16th 06 11:53 PM |
Pusher props for WW I fighters | John Bailey | Military Aviation | 3 | September 11th 04 10:18 AM |
Interested in Tractor vs. Pusher Gyroplane | Dunewood Truglia, Esq. | Rotorcraft | 1 | July 2nd 04 04:26 PM |
1/2 VW and a shrouded/ducted propeller? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 9 | May 6th 04 05:33 AM |
Ducted Fan Design | David | Home Built | 5 | February 7th 04 06:15 AM |