![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron" wrote in message ... Not entirely true. Forest Service will not accept them for any retardant tanker work. I believe some of the C-130As were used this summer, but outside the country. I know people who retrofit C-130s and they are saying many will soon be beer cans. The water bomber crash was bad for the C-130, but good for Bombardier. And again, not entirely true ![]() No Rob, it is entirely true that what happened is good for Bombardier. If you were to choose to acquire even the most basic understanding of the opertion of these quasi-public aircraft you would know that the "oldest airframe" is the first launched. Bombardier's fire bombers are new and subject to waiting a long long time before they are used today. A chnge in the law is likely, due to the fact that old aircraft are more prone to falling out of the sky. They are two different aircraft that would be best in two different environments. In big wide open areas with lots of lakes, like much of southern Canada, and Minnesota, those scoopers are great. Poor Ron, makes a false premise and then expands into more ignorance. But in the weste n states, the scoopers would not be near as useful. Alpine lakes surrounded by mountain peaks at around 10,000 MSL are not very good places to be trying to scoop water, especially during a summer day. Get back with us afeter you purchase a vowel, Ron. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|